A few of the problems with your analysis that immediately come to mind:

1. Statements issued by Muslims initially suggested that they were responsible: it appears that even Muslims could not imagine terrorists being non-Muslims during this particular period of history.

2. He was not a Christian terrorist for this simple reason: he was not Christian. (Nor was Timothy McVey–the agnostic.) He said that he really was not religious–as one might have guessed from his actions. He was only culturally Christian.

3. One nut in Norway didn’t change the world: the major problem facing the West remains Muslim terrorism and aggression.

See more: christian dating advice.